Must a promisor in an unsigned standard form contract bring the terms to the attention of the promisee?

In the context of a promisor and promisee relationship within contract law, particularly regarding unsigned standard form contracts, the correct stance is that the promisor must indeed bring the terms of the contract to the attention of the promisee for the contract to be enforceable. This is rooted in the principles of contract law that emphasize the need for mutual assent and informed agreement.

When a standard form contract is presented to a promisee, the terms and conditions included in that contract are not inherently known or understood by the promisee. Simply providing a contract without ensuring that the promisee is aware of its terms can lead to issues of consent and enforceability. The legal system upholds the necessity for transparency, especially in contexts where standard form contracts are used frequently, as they are often complex and may include clauses that significantly affect the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

Furthermore, if the terms are not brought to the promisee's attention, the promisee may be considered to have not consented properly to the contract's terms, which could subsequently result in disputes concerning what was agreed upon. Thus, ensuring that the promisee is aware of and understands the contract's terms is a critical component in confirming that a binding, enforceable agreement exists. This helps to