True or false: If a contract is void ab initio, it is considered valid from the beginning.

A contract that is described as void ab initio is inherently invalid from the outset. This legal term indicates that the contract has no binding force or legal effect from the moment it was created. Such contracts are treated as if they never existed, meaning that neither party can enforce its terms or claim benefits from it.

When a contract is void ab initio, it cannot be validated or ratified because it lacks the fundamental elements required for a valid contract, such as offer, acceptance, consideration, and legality. Therefore, stating that it is considered valid from the beginning contradicts the very definition of void ab initio.

In contrast, valid contracts are enforceable and bind the parties to their obligations, so the distinction is significant. The other options imply conditional validity or ambiguity, which do not align with the clear legal principle governing contracts that are void ab initio. Thus, the assertion that such a contract is considered valid from the beginning is unequivocally false.