True or false: The promisee will not be bound if the print was too fine to be legible or if the risk was not brought sensibly to their notice.

The assertion is true, as it reflects key principles within contract law, particularly in the context of hospitality. A promisee— the party to whom a promise is made— may not be bound by terms that were not adequately communicated or made legible.

In scenarios where the print in a contract is too fine to read, it can be argued that the promisee did not have a fair opportunity to understand the obligations or risks involved. This aligns with the legal doctrine of unconscionability, which protects parties from being bound by terms that are unfair or hidden in a way that they could not reasonably be expected to notice.

Similarly, if the risks associated with a contract are not communicated effectively or brought to the promisee's attention in a sensible manner, the promisee may not be bound to those terms. The rationale here is that for a contract to be enforceable, there must be an element of informed consent. Parties entering into contracts must have a clear understanding of what they are agreeing to; failure to do so undermines the validity of the agreement.

By ensuring that all significant information is presented in a clear and accessible manner, businesses protect themselves while also fostering trust and clear communication with their clients. This principle is especially relevant in the hospitality industry,