What is a common trait between jurors and litigants?

The common trait between jurors and litigants is that both participate in the legal process. Jurors serve as impartial fact-finders in a trial, weighing the evidence and coming to a verdict based on that evidence. Litigants, on the other hand, are the parties involved in a legal dispute; they bring their case to court seeking resolution.

Participation in the legal process is fundamental to both roles, as they contribute to the functioning of the justice system. Jurors help ensure that trials are fair and just, while litigants advocate for their interests and present their cases for consideration. Together, they are integral to the resolution of legal disputes within the court system.

In contrast, the other options involve misunderstandings about the roles of jurors and litigants. For instance, jurors typically do not have legal training, nor are they required to have any formal legal education, while litigants may or may not have such training themselves. Also, neither jurors nor litigants must be called to the bar, as being called to the bar relates specifically to legal professionals who practice law. Lastly, while litigants may have legal representatives, jurors cannot act as legal representatives, reinforcing the distinction in their roles within the legal framework.