Which of the following must be stated in writing to ensure enforceability according to certain contracts?

In Canadian law, certain types of contracts must be in writing to be enforceable, and one key category is agreements that are not to be performed within one year. This requirement is grounded in the Statute of Frauds, which applies to prevent misunderstandings and fraudulent claims by ensuring that substantial commitments are documented clearly. When a contract specifies that the performance will extend beyond one year, having it in writing helps establish the terms and intentions of the parties involved, offers proof of the agreement, and provides clarity regarding the obligations.

By contrast, agreements involving personal services might not necessarily require a written form; they can often be enforceable based on the nature of the agreement and the circumstances surrounding it. Agreements made over the phone or those that are purely verbal can also be enforceable if they meet the specific criteria established by law. However, not all verbal agreements require written form for enforceability, highlighting that the need for writing is more specifically oriented towards agreements that extend over a year. Hence, the requirement for certain contracts to be in writing is essential for ensuring that the obligations are clearly outlined and legally recognized.