Which of the following scenarios illustrates an unenforceable agreement?

The scenario that illustrates an unenforceable agreement is a contract made under duress. When one party is forced or threatened into an agreement, the contract lacks the essential element of genuine consent. Consent must be freely given, and if a person enters into a contract because of coercion or threats, the legal validity of that contract is compromised.

In the context of contractual law, agreements made under duress cannot be enforced because they do not represent the true intention of the parties involved. The agreement's enforcement would lead to injustice since one party did not have the freedom to make a voluntary choice.

In contrast, a contract involving two friends verbally agreeing to meet for lunch represents a social agreement rather than a legally enforceable contract, but it is not considered unenforceable in the same legal sense. Contracts made between a minor and an adult are typically unenforceable at the request of the minor, intended to protect minors from entering into agreements they may not fully understand. However, they are not rendered void as a matter of law; minors still have the option of affirming such contracts when they reach adulthood. A formal written agreement signed without understanding could also be potentially voidable, but it may not necessarily be classified as unenforceable if the contextual