Which of the following scenarios waives the requirement for a written agreement under the sales legislation?

The correct answer is that making full payment with the seller's acceptance waives the requirement for a written agreement under sales legislation. This scenario demonstrates a situation in which the buyer and seller have entered into a binding contract without needing a written document. When full payment is made, it signifies that the buyer has accepted the terms and conditions of the sale, and the seller's acceptance is implicitly understood through the transaction. Their actions—exchange of payment for goods—create a legally enforceable agreement, aligning with statutory provisions that allow for contracts to exist based on actions rather than written documentation.

In this context, other scenarios may not meet the same legal standards. For instance, while verbal acceptance can indicate agreement, it often lacks the clarity and permanence of a written contract. Similarly, the delivery of goods before payment may suggest an informal arrangement but does not automatically confirm a binding contract—it could be viewed as a gesture of goodwill or an interim agreement. Lastly, securing financing does not constitute acceptance of the terms of sale nor does it complete the transaction; it is merely a preparatory step that does not fulfill the requirements for waiving the written agreement mandate. Therefore, the strong position of full payment with seller acceptance is pivotal in understanding the circumstances under which a written agreement can