Which statement is true regarding the validity of gratuitous promises?

The statement that gratuitous promises usually have no legal remedy for non-performance is accurate. A gratuitous promise is one made without any consideration, meaning that the promisor does not receive anything in return for their promise. In the legal framework of contracts, most promises require consideration to be enforceable.

Since there is no contractual obligation tied to a gratuitous promise, if the promisor fails to fulfill their promise, the promisee generally does not have the right to seek legal remedies. This aligns with the principle that contracts often necessitate a mutual exchange of value to ensure that both parties have a legal recourse in the event of a breach.

In terms of the other options, reliance on a gratuitous promise does not create enforceability because, without consideration, the promise still lacks the necessary legal grounding. Similarly, while not fulfilling a gratuitous promise may disappoint the recipient, it does not constitute a breach of contract due to the absence of consideration, making the likelihood of a lawsuit minimal. Therefore, while some reliance or action may occur, it cannot transform a gratuitous promise into a legally binding obligation without consideration.